|MCLS Offices in Lansing|
Sustainable Collection Services (SCS)-- based in Contoocook, New Hampshire; Watertown, Massachusetts; Portland, Oregon; and with major operations in the cloud -- provides decision-support tools and services for deselection and shared print collection management. And in this case -- innovation.
Over the past six months, SCS and MCLS have collaborated on a unique pilot project: developing a shared print monographs program across seven Michigan academic libraries. Print book collections in these pilot libraries vary in size, from 160,000 to nearly 1.2 million titles. Participants are small, medium, and large state universities, including one ARL library. Some are confronting immediate space problems; some are not. But all seven libraries see long-term value in collaborative management of print book collections. In alphabetical order, these forward-looking libraries from the Wolverine State are:
Central Michigan University
Eastern Michigan University
Grand Valley State University
Michigan Technological University
Saginaw Valley State University
Wayne State University
Western Michigan University
You'll be hearing a lot about this project and these libraries in the coming months, and for good reason. MCLS and SCS have pioneered -- and implemented -- a practical shared management solution for low-use print monographs.
Working closely with SCS to compile and analyze their combined collections data, the MCLS pilot group identified 534,000 low-circulation 'title-holdings' to be considered for withdrawal from their collective shelves. (A title-holding is SCS terminology for a library-specific holding of a title held by multiple pilot libraries.) For these same titles, 2 title-holdings of each will be retained within the group. The 534,000 allocable withdrawal candidates were identified based on these criteria:
- 3 or fewer circulations since 1999
- Held by 3 or more pilot libraries
- Published or added before 2005
Allocation of withdrawal candidates (and corresponding assignment of retention commitments) among seven libraries proved a complex process. The desire to withdraw title-holdings with the fewest circulations had to be balanced against the withdrawal targets of those libraries needing space immediately. The relative size of collections also had to be factored in. Equity had to be defined and assured. After 15 iterations (!), SCS established an allocation algorithm that largely satisfied these objectives. (We'll be protecting *that* like the original formula for Coke!)
SCS is now producing lists of withdrawal candidates and retention commitments for each library. The lists will be completed by mid-March, and pilot libraries will be free to act on both fronts, in tandem with the Memorandum of Understanding now under construction. In its simplest terms, this project represents a clear example of the power of collaboration on shared print book collections. Working together provided both more collection security and more opportunity for withdrawals than any library acting alone.
- 3.8 million bib records, plus circulation and item data, were extracted from two different ILS systems, loaded to SCS servers, normalized, and compared to WorldCat & HathiTrust.
- Comparable circulation data existed for an 11-year period: 1999-2011. 1.74 million title-holdings (46%) did not circulate during that time. Normalization of circulation data is a major challenge.
- 1.36 million unique titles (36%) were held by the group. Even the smallest library held more than 40,000 unique titles.
- 989,000 titles (26%) were held by 4 or more pilot participants.
- 2.36 million (62%) title-holdings showed more than 100 WorldCat holdings. 2.93 million (77%) showed more than 50 WorldCat holdings.
- 1.57 million (41%) title-holdings were HathiTrust in-copyright titles. 131,00 (3%) were HathiTrust public domain titles.
We experienced (and at times created) data errors, but each in turn has been corrected, clarified, or restated as necessary. There are still policy issues to be worked through, especially around retention commitments. But together, MCLS, the pilot libraries, and SCS have made solid progress in creating an infrastructure for the shared management of print monographs.
The whole project has been and continues to be a remarkably pleasant experience. So, from the Granite State, the Bay State, and the Beaver State (components of the virtual SCS organization) to our collaborators in the Wolverine State, we say thank you for living up to Michigan's motto: "Si Quaeris Peninsulam Amoenam Circumspice" ;-) Or to paraphrase the translation of another Latin saying on behalf of the MCLS-SCS enterprise: 'We came. We crunched. We concurred.' We look forward to the next steps.